cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Share your quitting journey

FDA to target addictive levels of nicotine in cigarettes

TW517
Member
0 15 159

Interesting.  Not sure how I feel about this, so I'll just leave this here with no comment for now:

PUBLISHED: 07/28/17 07:12 PM EDT.
UPDATED: 07/28/17 07:13 PM EDT.

NEW YORK – For the first time, the federal government is proposing cutting the nicotine level in cigarettes so they aren't so addictive.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration chief Scott Gottlieb on Friday directed the agency's staff to develop new regulations on nicotine. The FDA has had the power since 2009 to regulate nicotine levels but hasn't done so. Stocks of cigarette makers plunged after the announcement.

As part of the new strategy, the FDA is giving e-cigarette makers four more years to comply with a review of products already on the market, Gottlieb said. The agency intends to write rules that balance safety with e-cigarettes' role in helping smokers quit, he said.

"A renewed focus on nicotine can help us to achieve a world where cigarettes no longer addict future generations of our kids," Gottlieb said in a speech to staff in Silver Spring, Maryland.

Tar and other substances inhaled through smoking make cigarettes deadly, but the nicotine in tobacco is what makes them addictive.

Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable heart disease, cancer and death in the United States, causing more than 480,000 deaths annually. Smoking rates, though, have been falling for decades and are at about 15 percent.

Gottlieb said he has asked the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products to explore whether lowering nicotine could create a black market for higher nicotine products and what role e-cigarettes and other products play in reducing harm from smoking. Battery-powered e-cigarettes turn liquid nicotine into an inhalable vapor. He also wants new rules to address flavored tobacco products and kids.

The FDA announcement is great news, said Eric Donny, a University of Pittsburgh researcher who has studied what happens when smokers puff on cigarettes with lower levels of nicotine. Donny and other researchers found that reducing nicotine substantially — by around 90 percent — leads to smokers being less dependent on cigarettes and smoking fewer of them.

There have been concerns that smokers might react to lower nicotine levels by smoking more. But the research shows that's not what happens — not if enough nicotine is taken out, Donny said.

"Most of the harm associated with smoking is related not to the nicotine but everything else in the smoke. Reducing nicotine doesn't make a cigarette safe, it just makes it less addictive," said Donny, director of Pitt's Center for the Evaluation of Nicotine in Cigarettes.

There's additional research underway to see how often people who smoke lower-nicotine cigarettes switch to e-cigarettes or other, less harmful tobacco products, he said.

Kenneth Warner, a retired University of Michigan public health professor who is a leading authority on smoking and health, said he was pleasantly surprised to learn of the FDA announcement.

"If you can separate the nicotine people are craving from the smoke that's killing them, then you may be doing something very important," Warner said.

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids president Matthew Myers praised the overall approach as "a bold and comprehensive vision" but called the e-cigarettes delay "a serious error."

"This long delay will allow egregious, kid-friendly e-cigarettes and cigars, in flavors like gummy bear, cherry crush and banana smash, to stay on the market with little public health oversight," Myers said in a statement.

Altria Group, which sells Marlboro, other brands and e-cigarettes in the U.S., said it would be "fully engaged" in FDA's rule-making process.

"It's important to understand that any proposed rule such as a nicotine product standard must be based on science and evidence, must not lead to unintended consequences and must be technically achievable," the company said in a statement.

Gottlieb touched on premium cigars in his announcement, saying the agency wants to hear from the industry about their patterns of use and public health impacts. He said the FDA will "seriously consider" new data relevant to how premium cigars should be regulated.

©2017 by 10TV.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
15 Comments
JonesCarpeDiem

In the past, as the sales dropped, tobacco manufacturers have increased the amount of nicotine to keep the remaining smokers "faithful."

See? They were looking out for us all along.

JonesCarpeDiem

Cutting the nicotine won't help. People will just smoke more.

TW517
Member

That's what I'm thinking.  And since they apparently have the power to regulate, why not just ban cigarettes altogether?

JonesCarpeDiem

because not everyone wants to quit. 🙂

JonesCarpeDiem

We would have tobacco riots!

JonesCarpeDiem

It's obvious the FDA hasn't realized that once you sensitize the nicotine receptors, you're going to need that same amount no matter how many you have to smoke.

Diannnnn
Member

Yeah, this doesn't solve the problem. However, I am not one to believe the government should be in charge of people's right to make their own choices. Instead of spending money to figure out how to make them less addictive spend it on enforcing the age restriction. Education is important too, but the bulletproof feeling when I was a teen extended well into my 30's. I knew all along smoking was not good for me, but it wasn't until I got pissed about being in the hospital and taking all those bloody drugs that I let that knowledge come to the forefront.

What if there was a country-wide curriculum developed that made a semester long "The Consequences of Unhealthy Life-style Choices" mandatory? And I'm not talking about the old sex ed style class where the least attractive teacher in school spent the entire class red-faced....I'm talking about in your face, graphic images and visits to or from those dying with a minimum 90% pass/fail market. Obviously it would be high school and you'd prob have to get parental permission, but wouldn't that be more helpful? Heck, maybe they do that now and I don't know about it.

Just my thoughts. Thanks for sharing TW517‌. 

elvan
Member

I looked this up last night after I heard it on the news...the FDA can't stop the sale of cigarettes but if I understood it, they are trying to lead people into the "safer" alternative of e-cigarettes...WHAT so they can keep them addicted FOREVER and just WHAT is safe about e-cigarettes?  Did I misunderstand that information?  I was pretty tired last night and now I have to get ready for work.

YoungAtHeart
Member

I negate the entire effort once I read they believe e-cigarettes are a '"safer alternative."   There are studies that show they cause irreversible lung damage, they continue the physical AND psychological aspects of smoking, and can explode in your FACE!

I think everyone will just revert to them - and we will have yet ANOTHER generation hooked on nicotine, with just a different form of lung disease and with burn scars!

Nancy

EleanorRigby
Member

If anybody thinks the FDA is going to do anything like that maybe they'll buy my ocean side property in Arizona.  They have known about nicotine addiction since the 50's.. maybe earlier.   Big tobacco is too big to fail and the government needs the tax money.  When  you have some time watch the youtube entitled Tobacco Wars..  from there there are dozens of others.  Don't get me started on this subject, I just got up and don't want to ruin my day..LOLOL... oh, and P.S.  research who is buying up all the e-cig companies... 

elvan
Member

OH YES, that was EXACTLY what I was looking for in a response.  Get my heart rate up and my ire motivating me!

freeneasy
Member

It's probably a good thing. Big tobacco raised the nicotine level in cigarettes to make more money not to help smokers get a quicker fix. 

maryfreecig
Member

One more step in the right direction--wheels of justice do grind sloooooooowwwwww. Smoking will go on, but that doesn't mean that cigs have to be cheap, easy, on every corner for all the 17-25 year olds who are the fresh blood for the tobacco companies. Every bit of making it harder to smoke will lead to lowered overall smoking...already has in the US. 

I have a lot of faith and optimism that smoking and tobacco will decline in the US. Can't say why for sure, just know that activists have been plugging away at making it less easy to smoke for many decades. I owe them a debt of gratitude--I remember the 60s 70s. Did anybody not have a cigarette in their mouth? Anybody?

TW517
Member

I started in 1972. I was the last of my family and friends to start. I did not know a single person who did not smoke. 

EleanorRigby
Member

I think the last I saw cigarette smoking was down to only about 17% of the population... thats darn good from when tw5152017 and I were young....the trend is moving towards e-cigs and all the production of that product will be done by tobacco companies...  yet another way to addict and control  us.  Will it ever end?    The tobacco industry didn't make me take that first puff but they might as well have.   freeneasy  The way I understand it is that tobacco companies started putting additives tin their cigs to make them more addictive, (over 4000 chemicals in a cig) so that we still buy them and its harder to quit... it wasn't so much about money or quicker fixes, although that was a bi product..  it was about declining market share, which by making the cigs more addictive it kinda helped their money problem.   I am no expert, just do a lot of reading.    

What's in a Cigarette? - YouTube 

What's in a cigarette? | Cancer Research UK 

Anyway, sorry, guess I am board this afternooon.. it's really hot here in Arizona so don't go out much.  LOL